Cartoon Network & Adult Swim Anti Christian & Spirit of Anti Christ Part 2 (Vlog/Video)

Family Guy Mocks God: Gnostic Indoctranation

Henry Kissinger on Putting Together of a New World Order

Article Source: Wall Street Journal

Libya is in civil war, fundamentalist armies are building a self-declared caliphate across Syria and Iraq and Afghanistan's young democracy is on the verge of paralysis. To these troubles are added a resurgence of tensions with Russia and a relationship with China divided between pledges of cooperation and public recrimination. The concept of order that has underpinned the modern era is in crisis.

The search for world order has long been defined almost exclusively by the concepts of Western societies. In the decades following World War II, the U.S.—strengthened in its economy and national confidence—began to take up the torch of international leadership and added a new dimension. A nation founded explicitly on an idea of free and representative governance, the U.S. identified its own rise with the spread of liberty and democracy and credited these forces with an ability to achieve just and lasting peace. The traditional European approach to order had viewed peoples and states as inherently competitive; to constrain the effects of their clashing ambitions, it relied on a balance of power and a concert of enlightened statesmen. The prevalent American view considered people inherently reasonable and inclined toward peaceful compromise and common sense; the spread of democracy was therefore the overarching goal for international order. Free markets would uplift individuals, enrich societies and substitute economic interdependence for traditional international rivalries. 

This effort to establish world order has in many ways come to fruition. A plethora of independent sovereign states govern most of the world's territory. The spread of democracy and participatory governance has become a shared aspiration if not a universal reality; global communications and financial networks operate in real time.

The years from perhaps 1948 to the turn of the century marked a brief moment in human history when one could speak of an incipient global world order composed of an amalgam of American idealism and traditional European concepts of statehood and balance of power. But vast regions of the world have never shared and only acquiesced in the Western concept of order. These reservations are now becoming explicit, for example, in the Ukraine crisis and the South China Sea. The order established and proclaimed by the West stands at a turning point.

First, the nature of the state itself—the basic formal unit of international life—has been subjected to a multitude of pressures. Europe has set out to transcend the state and craft a foreign policy based primarily on the principles of soft power. But it is doubtful that claims to legitimacy separated from a concept of strategy can sustain a world order. And Europe has not yet given itself attributes of statehood, tempting a vacuum of authority internally and an imbalance of power along its borders. At the same time, parts of the Middle East have dissolved into sectarian and ethnic components in conflict with each other; religious militias and the powers backing them violate borders and sovereignty at will, producing the phenomenon of failed states not controlling their own territory.

The challenge in Asia is the opposite of Europe's: Balance-of-power principles prevail unrelated to an agreed concept of legitimacy, driving some disagreements to the edge of confrontation.

The clash between the international economy and the political institutions that ostensibly govern it also weakens the sense of common purpose necessary for world order. The economic system has become global, while the political structure of the world remains based on the nation-state. Economic globalization, in its essence, ignores national frontiers. Foreign policy affirms them, even as it seeks to reconcile conflicting national aims or ideals of world order.

This dynamic has produced decades of sustained economic growth punctuated by periodic financial crises of seemingly escalating intensity: in Latin America in the 1980s; in Asia in 1997; in Russia in 1998; in the U.S. in 2001 and again starting in 2007; in Europe after 2010. The winners have few reservations about the system. But the losers—such as those stuck in structural misdesigns, as has been the case with the European Union's southern tier—seek their remedies by solutions that negate, or at least obstruct, the functioning of the global economic system.

The international order thus faces a paradox: Its prosperity is dependent on the success of globalization, but the process produces a political reaction that often works counter to its aspirations.

A third failing of the current world order, such as it exists, is the absence of an effective mechanism for the great powers to consult and possibly cooperate on the most consequential issues. This may seem an odd criticism in light of the many multilateral forums that exist—more by far than at any other time in history. Yet the nature and frequency of these meetings work against the elaboration of long-range strategy. This process permits little beyond, at best, a discussion of pending tactical issues and, at worst, a new form of summitry as "social media" event. A contemporary structure of international rules and norms, if it is to prove relevant, cannot merely be affirmed by joint declarations; it must be fostered as a matter of common conviction.

The penalty for failing will be not so much a major war between states (though in some regions this remains possible) as an evolution into spheres of influence identified with particular domestic structures and forms of governance. At its edges, each sphere would be tempted to test its strength against other entities deemed illegitimate. A struggle between regions could be even more debilitating than the struggle between nations has been.

The contemporary quest for world order will require a coherent strategy to establish a concept of order within the various regions and to relate these regional orders to one another. These goals are not necessarily self-reconciling: The triumph of a radical movement might bring order to one region while setting the stage for turmoil in and with all others. The domination of a region by one country militarily, even if it brings the appearance of order, could produce a crisis for the rest of the world.

A world order of states affirming individual dignity and participatory governance, and cooperating internationally in accordance with agreed-upon rules, can be our hope and should be our inspiration. But progress toward it will need to be sustained through a series of intermediary stages.

To play a responsible role in the evolution of a 21st-century world order, the U.S. must be prepared to answer a number of questions for itself: What do we seek to prevent, no matter how it happens, and if necessary alone? What do we seek to achieve, even if not supported by any multilateral effort? What do we seek to achieve, or prevent,only if supported by an alliance? What should we not engage in, even if urged on by a multilateral group or an alliance? What is the nature of the values that we seek to advance? And how much does the application of these values depend on circumstance?

For the U.S., this will require thinking on two seemingly contradictory levels. The celebration of universal principles needs to be paired with recognition of the reality of other regions' histories, cultures and views of their security. Even as the lessons of challenging decades are examined, the affirmation of America's exceptional nature must be sustained. History offers no respite to countries that set aside their sense of identity in favor of a seemingly less arduous course. But nor does it assure success for the most elevated convictions in the absence of a comprehensive geopolitical strategy.

Lady Gaga 666 Hand-Signs at 2013 VMA

Evangelist Lady Gaga leading the worship service of 666 on the 2013 VMA

Well the "princess of darkness" Lady Gaga was at it again at the MTV Video Music Awards show.  She was seen throwing up the 666 hand-signs throughout the performance of her song "Applause."  Gaga, in her music videos, concerts, and music awards performances, takes it to another level when projecting Illuminati/satanic symbols.  This method is used as subliminal messages to enter the subconscious minds of the intended audience/worshipers/victims to sow satanic messages.  Ultimately, this leads people away from G-d and the Truth.

Video and Still Pictures of Gaga's Hand -Signs at 2013 VMA Performance

  

Objective of Lady Gaga Message is to Awaken the Wolf/Beast in Man

Satanic Priest Discusses the use of Music and Symbolism as Spiritual Warfare

Lady Gaga looks as if she has taken a page out of Satanic Priest Nikolas Schreck's satanic play book by using her music and symbolism to open her fans/worshipers to the realm of the demonic. Her message is that of sexual immorality, rebellion, and gender confusion. She is one of Satan's leading evangelists in the entertainment world because her message is so blatantly in your face.  It is literally preparing people to receive the soon coming Anti-Christ.  Lady Gaga is ultimately seeking to eradicate Judeo-Christian values from the youth, and uplift the satanic values of "do wilt thou will" or "do whatever you want." 

Christian parents listen up!  There's a spiritual battle taking place for the hearts and minds of your children.  We need to pray and properly discern the evil times in which we live.  Christian children!  It's time to stop watching MTV, and listening and looking at music videos that are contrary to the Word of G-d.  Get this junk out of your physical house and out of your hearts!  Jesus Christ is soon to come! Will you be ready when He does?

       

Revelation 18:1-4

King James Version (KJV)

18 And after these things I saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power; and the earth was lightened with his glory.

2 And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.
3 For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies.
4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.

Desmond Tutu: An Emissary of Satan Desires Hell

Archbishop Tutu Would Rather Go to Hell Than Go to a Homophobic Heaven!

South Africa's retired False Archbishop   and Nobel Peace Prize winner Desmond Tutu was speaking at the launch of the United Nations-backed campaign in South Africa to promote gay rights. Tutu compared homophobia to racism. He went on to say that he would rather go to Hell than go to a Homophobic Heaven(source)!  I don't think Tutu is working on the Kingdom of Heaven team.  What team is he working for then? You guessed it! Team Satan and the Kingdom of Darkness! Behind the clergy collar and the religious title of Archbishop, this man is an emissary for Satan. He is not at all a man of G-d, but a man of Satan! Let's look at the the truth of the roots behind the agenda Desmond Tutu is attempting to advance for the kingdom of darkness.

Desmond Tutu's Devilish Resume 

Tutu desires a One World Government and a One World Religion

Desmond Tutu follows an agenda that is Anti-Christ. This man not only promotes homosexuality, but abortion, one world government, one world religion, and an anti-biblical view of Jesus Christ.

Point 1: Tutu promotes abortion.
He has stated the following about abortion, "Planned Parenthood is an obligation of those who are Christians. Our church thinks we should use scientific methods that assist in planning families(source)."

Point 2: Tutu is helping to push a one-world government.
Not only is Desmond Tutu a supporter of the United Nations, but as quiet as it's kept he is a supporter of "The World Constitution and Parliament Association."  What is The World Constitution and Parliament Association? It's an association that is looking to replace the United Nations.  It looks to protect the mother earth environment, abolish war, make world patriotism the norm over national patriotism, operate world judiciary, defend universal human rights, and end poverty (source).  This association is attempting to usher in a one-world government, in which Tutu is playing a role.  This man is obviously globalist.

Point 3: Desmond Tutu is a proud member and supporter of the United Religious Initiative.
The United Religious Initiative is an organization that was established by Episcopal Bishop William Swing. Swing's vision is to set up a united nations of religions, and ultimately establish a one world religion.

Point 4: Desmond Tutu holds anti-biblical beliefs of Jesus Christ.
This false Bishop doesn't even believe in the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ(source). In his book "God is not a Christian: And Other Provocations," he promotes inclusion stating that all religions, atheist, and sinners are the children of God(source/source). Let's see how Tutu's beliefs don't lineup with the scriptures:

Romans 10:9

King James Version (KJV)

9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.

John 14:6

King James Version (KJV)

6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

Desmond Tutu is a strong believer in the "doctrine of inclusion," and not the "gospel of Jesus Christ." He is an agent of Satan who is promoting the agenda of Anti-Christ while aiding the soon coming system of Anti-Christ as seen in Revelation 13.

Tutu, you don't have to worry about going to a "homophobic heaven" because 1 Corinthians 6:9 states that those who participate in homosexual activity shall not inherit the Kingdom of God.  Any person with unrepented sin that is against the Word of God will not inherit the Kingdom of God. Your Nobel Peace Prize and other worldly accolades will not help you when you are judged in the final judgement of Jesus Christ.  If you don't repent you will be cast into the Lake of Fire because of your unbelief in Jesus Christ and your disobedience to the Word of God.

Trust me, if Tutu gets his wish to go to Hell, he will soon find out that it's a place of  everlasting torment, fire, darkness, and gnashing of teeth.

Psalm 2 reminds me of Desmond Tutu's words and action(see below).

Psalm 2

Amplified Bible (AMP)

Psalm 2

1 Why do the nations assemble with commotion [uproar and confusion of voices], and why do the people imagine (meditate upon and devise) an empty scheme?

2 The kings of the earth take their places; the rulers take counsel together against the Lord and His Anointed One (the Messiah, the Christ). They say,

3 Let us break Their bands [of restraint] asunder and cast Their cords [of control] from us.

4 He Who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord has them in derision [and in supreme contempt He mocks them].

5 He speaks to them in His deep anger and troubles (terrifies and confounds) them in His displeasure and fury, saying,

6 Yet have I anointed (installed and placed) My King [firmly] on My holy hill of Zion.

7 I will declare the decree of the Lord: He said to Me, You are My Son; this day [I declare] I have begotten You.

8 Ask of Me, and I will give You the nations as Your inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth as Your possession.

9 You shall break them with a rod of iron; You shall dash them in pieces like potters’ ware.

10 Now therefore, O you kings, act wisely; be instructed and warned, O you rulers of the earth.

11 Serve the Lord with reverent awe and worshipful fear; rejoice and be in high spirits with trembling [lest you displease Him].

12 Kiss the Son [pay homage to Him in purity], lest He be angry and you perish in the way, for soon shall His wrath be kindled. O blessed (happy, fortunate, and to be envied) are all those who seek refuge and put their trust in Him!

Bash Mobs: The Spirit of Anti-christ and Lawlessness

Bash Mobs in Southern Cali

The Bible speaks about in the "last days" that lawlessness will prevail.

2 Timothy 3:1-5

King James Version (KJV)

3 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.

2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,
3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,
4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;
5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.

Matthew 24:12

Amplified Bible (AMP)

12 And the love of [a]the great body of people will grow cold because of the multiplied lawlessness and iniquity,

2 Thessalonians 2:3-8

Amplified Bible (AMP)

3 Let no one deceive or beguile you in any way, for that day will not come except the [a]apostasy comes first [unless the predicted great [b]falling away of those who have professed to be Christians has come], and the man of lawlessness (sin) is revealed, who is the son of doom (of perdition),

4 Who opposes and exalts himself so proudly and insolently against and over all that is called God or that is worshiped, [even to his actually] taking his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming that he himself is God.

5 Do you not recollect that when I was still with you, I told you these things?

6 And now you know what is restraining him [from being revealed at this time]; it is so that he may be manifested (revealed) in his own [appointed] time.

7 For the mystery of lawlessness (that hidden principle of rebellion against constituted authority) is already at work in the world, [but it is] restrained only until [c]he who restrains is taken out of the way.

8 And then the lawless one (the antichrist) will be revealed and the Lord Jesus will slay him with the breath of His mouth and bring him to an end by His appearing at His coming.

Beyonce Touches a Fan Catches Kundalini Spirit and Not the Holy Ghost!

The video above depicts Beyonce touching one of her fans.  To suggest that the fan's touch of Beyonce's hand causes him to catch the Holy Ghost is outright blasphemous!  You can't be on stage shacking your butt, and singing seductive songs and believe that the Holy Spirit is at work. No No No! The Holy Spirit doesn't operate alongside profane things that are against G-d. Can a person really receive the Holy Spirit while worshiping Beyonce? 

Beyonces Imparts Kundalini Spirit to her Fan

7 Chakra Third Eye and Releasing of the Kundalini Spirit

What you witnessed in this video is two things:  celebrity idol worship, and the working of demon spirits or the Kundalini spirit. What is the Kundalini spirit?  It's a spiritual awakening where the Kundalini spirit rises from the spine to the top of the head which merges with the Crown Chakra.  The Crown Chakra is seen at the seat of the spirit in body.  The fiery serpent spirit is then  awakened (third eye). The high frequency of the fiery serpent awakens all the chakras, destroys limitations of all levels of a person's being and finally transforms them into a god or goddess (source).  Or so it says in the Hinduism and occult writings. Another word for Kundalini is Shaktipat. A person can sometimes receive the Kundalini/Shaktipat demonic anointing by the laying on of hands.  The recipient may come off as a drunk with uncontrollable movements of his or her body, uncontrollable laughter, and a light feeling in the head (source). Kundalini will mimic the Holy Spirit, but it IS NOT the Holy Spirit.  It's an unholy spirit from the pit of Hell.

We are living in a time when people will worship the Anti-Christ and Satan himself. As the Book of Revelation reveals, Satan is that great dragon, and in Revelations 13:4 the world will be worshiping the dragon.  Beyonce is doing her job as Satan's evangelist to help prepare the world to receive Satan and his Anti-Christ. So don't be deceived; Beyonce DID NOT help this fan receive the Holy Ghost, but a seducing spirit! Please be aware that Satan and his people can come with lying signs and wonders! Don't get duped people of G-d!

Famous Celebrities Throwing up 666 Hand-Sign(Hall of Hell)

Many in western society may view this hand sign as gesture of saying OK. But are many celebrities projecting  that everything is ok, or is there more to this symbol?  In the occult, when person has bent three fingers it is the shape of 666. One 6 represents the sun deity(Lucifer), the second 6 represents the Goddess (Mystery Babylon, The Mother of Harlots), and the third 6 is for the beast (anti-christ) or offspring (source/source).

Lady Gaga

Beyonce

Justin Timberlake

Johnny Deep

Andrew Bynum

Emma Watson

Lil' Wayne

Jim Jones

Justin Bieber

Corey Feldman

Drake

Madonna

The Beatles

T Pain

Serving Satan and sin will get you a one way ticket to the "Lake":

You guess it, getting cast into the Lake of Fire!

One way ticket to eternal damnation! 

Mark 8:36

King James Version (KJV)

36 For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?

So what does it really profit man or woman to gain money/wealth/fame only to his lose his or her soul? Is really worth it? Pray for these folks that they repent before it is to late! They need Jesus Christ right now!

Student Sues Over RFID Chip(Mark of the Beast or not?)

Source Huffington Post

AUSTIN, Texas -- To 15-year-old Andrea Hernandez, the tracking microchip embedded in her student ID card is a "mark of the beast," sacrilege to her Christian faith – not to mention how it pinpoints her location, even in the school bathroom.

But to her budget-reeling San Antonio school district, those chips carry a potential $1.7 million in classroom funds.

Starting this fall, the fourth-largest school district in Texas is experimenting with "locator" chips in student ID badges on two of its campuses, allowing administrators to track the whereabouts of 4,200 students with GPS-like precision. Hernandez's refusal to participate isn't a twist on teenage rebellion, but has launched a debate over privacy and religion that has forged a rare like-mindedness between typically opposing groups.

When Hernandez and her parents balked at the so-called SmartID, the school agreed to remove the chip but still required her to wear the badge. The family refused on religious grounds, stating in a lawsuit that even wearing the badge was tantamount to "submission of a false god" because the card still indicated her participation.

A state district judge had been expected to decide Wednesday whether Northside Independent School District could transfer Hernandez to a different campus. But the family's attorney said late Tuesday that the hearing was cancelled after the school district asked that the case be moved to federal court.

A new hearing hasn't been set.

"How often do you see an issue where the ACLU and Christian fundamentalists come together? It's unusual," said Chris Steinbach, the chief of staff for a Republican state lawmaker who has filed a bill to outlaw the technology in Texas schools.

The concept isn't new, but hasn't exactly caught on nationwide. In 2005, the American Civil Liberties Union raised concerns about a similar initiative at a California school. That same year, a suburban Houston school district began putting the chips in its student IDs, and served as the blueprint for Northside's pilot program that began this fall.

Ronald Stephens, executive director of the nonprofit National School Safety Center, said he didn't believe the technology to be widespread but predicted "it'll be the next wave" in schools. The chips use radio-frequency identification (RFID) transmitters and only work on campus.

The Northside school district spent roughly $261,000 to equip students at one high school and one middle school with SmartIDs, a decision made with safety and efficiency in mind, said district spokesman Pascual Gonzalez. Imagine quickly accounting for students in the event of a lockdown, he said, or cafeteria lines moving faster as scanners instantly identify who's picking up that lunch tray.

Yet the biggest motivation was financial. In Texas, school funding is based on daily attendance. The more students seated in homeroom when the first bell rings, the more state dollars the school receives. If a student is lingering in the hallway or the library when roll is called, the marked absence hurts the school's bottom line.

But with the locator chips – the district doesn't like to call them "tracking" – a clerk in the main office can find out if a student is elsewhere on campus, and if so, include them in the attendance count. Every student found amounts to another $30 in funding, based on the school's calculations. In that way, those moving red dots that represent students on the clerk's computer screen are like finding change in the couch cushions.

Gonzalez said the district has estimated another $1.7 million in funding if the program delivers on expectations, somewhat lessening the sting of losing $61.5 million after state lawmakers cut public school funding in Texas by nearly $5 billion last year.

"Nobody is sitting at a bank of monitors looking for the whereabouts of 3,000 students," Gonzalez said. "We don't have the personnel for it, nor do we have the need to do that. But when I need to find (a student), I can enter his random number and I can find him somewhere as a red dot on that computer screen. `Oh, there he is, in Science Room 22' or whatever. So we can locate students, but it's not about tracking them."

Hernandez's family isn't convinced. Nor is a Virginia-based civil rights group, The Rutherford Institute, which took up Hernandez's cause and filed the lawsuit against the district.

The organization declined to make the Hernandez family available for an interview Tuesday, before the Wednesday court hearing had been cancelled.

John Whitehead, the organization's founder, believes the religious component of the lawsuit makes it stronger than if it only objected on grounds of privacy. The lawsuit cites scriptures in the book of Revelation, stating that "acceptance of a certain code ... from a secular ruling authority" is a form of idolatry.

Wearing the badge, the family argues, takes it a step further.

"It starts with that religious concern," Whitehead said. "There is a large mark of Evangelicals that believe in the `mark of the beast.' "

Republican state Rep. Lois Kolkhorst has filed bills since 2005 to ban the chips in Texas public schools. Steinbach, her chief of staff, is hopeful the bill will now get more traction with the attention surrounding Hernandez's case.

Yet despite the lawsuit, proposed legislation and concern from outside groups, there are no signs of a groundswell of opposition in San Antonio from parents whose children have the chips in their campus IDs.

Gonzalez said that of the 4,200 students, the Hernandez family is the only one who has asked out of the program.

 What is the Meaning of 666/Mark of the Beast?

In E.W. Bullinger book "Number in Scripture," he states the following about 666: 

"When the name of Anti-Christ is known its gematria will doubtless be found be the number 666.Gematria is not a means by which the name is discovered; but it will be a test and a proof by which the name may identified after the person is revealed.  But the number has a far deeper reference to the connection of the secret mysteries of the ancient religions, which will be again manifested in connection with the last great apostasy. If six is the number of secular or human perfection, then 666 is therefore the culmination of human pride in independence of G-d and opposition to His Christ (source)." 

So 666 is culmination of human pride which totally rejects the will of G-d.  It is the culmination of the full manifestation of the mystery of iniquity. What is the mystery of iniquity? The mystery of iniquity is the primary satanic spirits working behind the scenes throughout human history preparing the way for a one world government and one world church for Satan Anti-Christ.

Are RFID Chips Part of 666 System ?