Antichrist and the 10 Kings Arising En Route to One World Government-Vlog

Please click on the video to view? Also Please share the video?

Henry Kissinger on Putting Together of a New World Order

Article Source: Wall Street Journal

Libya is in civil war, fundamentalist armies are building a self-declared caliphate across Syria and Iraq and Afghanistan's young democracy is on the verge of paralysis. To these troubles are added a resurgence of tensions with Russia and a relationship with China divided between pledges of cooperation and public recrimination. The concept of order that has underpinned the modern era is in crisis.

The search for world order has long been defined almost exclusively by the concepts of Western societies. In the decades following World War II, the U.S.—strengthened in its economy and national confidence—began to take up the torch of international leadership and added a new dimension. A nation founded explicitly on an idea of free and representative governance, the U.S. identified its own rise with the spread of liberty and democracy and credited these forces with an ability to achieve just and lasting peace. The traditional European approach to order had viewed peoples and states as inherently competitive; to constrain the effects of their clashing ambitions, it relied on a balance of power and a concert of enlightened statesmen. The prevalent American view considered people inherently reasonable and inclined toward peaceful compromise and common sense; the spread of democracy was therefore the overarching goal for international order. Free markets would uplift individuals, enrich societies and substitute economic interdependence for traditional international rivalries. 

This effort to establish world order has in many ways come to fruition. A plethora of independent sovereign states govern most of the world's territory. The spread of democracy and participatory governance has become a shared aspiration if not a universal reality; global communications and financial networks operate in real time.

The years from perhaps 1948 to the turn of the century marked a brief moment in human history when one could speak of an incipient global world order composed of an amalgam of American idealism and traditional European concepts of statehood and balance of power. But vast regions of the world have never shared and only acquiesced in the Western concept of order. These reservations are now becoming explicit, for example, in the Ukraine crisis and the South China Sea. The order established and proclaimed by the West stands at a turning point.

First, the nature of the state itself—the basic formal unit of international life—has been subjected to a multitude of pressures. Europe has set out to transcend the state and craft a foreign policy based primarily on the principles of soft power. But it is doubtful that claims to legitimacy separated from a concept of strategy can sustain a world order. And Europe has not yet given itself attributes of statehood, tempting a vacuum of authority internally and an imbalance of power along its borders. At the same time, parts of the Middle East have dissolved into sectarian and ethnic components in conflict with each other; religious militias and the powers backing them violate borders and sovereignty at will, producing the phenomenon of failed states not controlling their own territory.

The challenge in Asia is the opposite of Europe's: Balance-of-power principles prevail unrelated to an agreed concept of legitimacy, driving some disagreements to the edge of confrontation.

The clash between the international economy and the political institutions that ostensibly govern it also weakens the sense of common purpose necessary for world order. The economic system has become global, while the political structure of the world remains based on the nation-state. Economic globalization, in its essence, ignores national frontiers. Foreign policy affirms them, even as it seeks to reconcile conflicting national aims or ideals of world order.

This dynamic has produced decades of sustained economic growth punctuated by periodic financial crises of seemingly escalating intensity: in Latin America in the 1980s; in Asia in 1997; in Russia in 1998; in the U.S. in 2001 and again starting in 2007; in Europe after 2010. The winners have few reservations about the system. But the losers—such as those stuck in structural misdesigns, as has been the case with the European Union's southern tier—seek their remedies by solutions that negate, or at least obstruct, the functioning of the global economic system.

The international order thus faces a paradox: Its prosperity is dependent on the success of globalization, but the process produces a political reaction that often works counter to its aspirations.

A third failing of the current world order, such as it exists, is the absence of an effective mechanism for the great powers to consult and possibly cooperate on the most consequential issues. This may seem an odd criticism in light of the many multilateral forums that exist—more by far than at any other time in history. Yet the nature and frequency of these meetings work against the elaboration of long-range strategy. This process permits little beyond, at best, a discussion of pending tactical issues and, at worst, a new form of summitry as "social media" event. A contemporary structure of international rules and norms, if it is to prove relevant, cannot merely be affirmed by joint declarations; it must be fostered as a matter of common conviction.

The penalty for failing will be not so much a major war between states (though in some regions this remains possible) as an evolution into spheres of influence identified with particular domestic structures and forms of governance. At its edges, each sphere would be tempted to test its strength against other entities deemed illegitimate. A struggle between regions could be even more debilitating than the struggle between nations has been.

The contemporary quest for world order will require a coherent strategy to establish a concept of order within the various regions and to relate these regional orders to one another. These goals are not necessarily self-reconciling: The triumph of a radical movement might bring order to one region while setting the stage for turmoil in and with all others. The domination of a region by one country militarily, even if it brings the appearance of order, could produce a crisis for the rest of the world.

A world order of states affirming individual dignity and participatory governance, and cooperating internationally in accordance with agreed-upon rules, can be our hope and should be our inspiration. But progress toward it will need to be sustained through a series of intermediary stages.

To play a responsible role in the evolution of a 21st-century world order, the U.S. must be prepared to answer a number of questions for itself: What do we seek to prevent, no matter how it happens, and if necessary alone? What do we seek to achieve, even if not supported by any multilateral effort? What do we seek to achieve, or prevent,only if supported by an alliance? What should we not engage in, even if urged on by a multilateral group or an alliance? What is the nature of the values that we seek to advance? And how much does the application of these values depend on circumstance?

For the U.S., this will require thinking on two seemingly contradictory levels. The celebration of universal principles needs to be paired with recognition of the reality of other regions' histories, cultures and views of their security. Even as the lessons of challenging decades are examined, the affirmation of America's exceptional nature must be sustained. History offers no respite to countries that set aside their sense of identity in favor of a seemingly less arduous course. But nor does it assure success for the most elevated convictions in the absence of a comprehensive geopolitical strategy.

Jesse Jackson World Government/ United Nations and Trayvon Martin Case

Story Source Nationalreview.com

Calls for Congress to hold hearings on the death of Trayvon Martin don’t go far enough for Jesse Jackson: He’s demanding international oversight. The reverend wants the United Nations Human Rights Council to investigate the case as well.

“And it’s time to call on the United Nations Human Rights Commission for an in-depth investigation of whether the U.S. is upholding its obligations under international human-rights laws and treaties,” Jackson said. (CNS.com notes that the Human Rights Commission was actually replaced by the Human Rights Council in 2006.)

U.N. officials, including the council’s top official, weighed in on the case when it first began to unfold. High Commissioner Navi Pillay called for an investigation last year. Other committees associated with the council pointed to the case in terms of race as well and criticized Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” laws.

The HRC is often criticized for being composed of nations notable for their own human-rights violations. Last year the terms of China, Cuba, and Saudi Arabia expired, but Pakistan and Venezuela remain members.

Jackson also voiced support for a congressional investigation. Illinois Democrat Luis Gutiérrez called for Judiciary Committee hearings on the case earlier this week.

History/Resume Points of Jesse Jackson's Anti-Christ Agenda

Facts about Jackson:

1. He  is a member of The Council of Foreign Relation/CFR(source).

2. He is a Freemason(source).

3. He supports same-sex marriage(source).

4. He supports abortion/pro-choice(source).

In 1991 Jackson was a speaker at The World Constitution and Parliament (En Route to Global Occupation, P. 169/Exhibit C, by Gary H. Kah). This association looks to replace the United Nations.  It also looks to protect the mother earth environment, abolish war, make world patriotism the norm over national patriotism,  operate world judiciary, defend universal human rights, and end poverty(source).

As stated above in the points of Jackson's resume, his interest is not to help and advance African-American people.  His true agenda is to advance a One-World Government and Religious system which points to the soon-coming Anti-Christ system.  He is attempting to use the Trayvon Martin case as a way to allow the United Nations to have more jurisdiction in legal and governmental affairs in the United States.  

    

Revelation 13

King James Version (KJV)

13 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.

2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.

3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.

4 And they worshiped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshiped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?

5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.

6 And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven.

7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindred's, and tongues, and nations.

8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.

9 If any man have an ear, let him hear.

10 He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints.

11 And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.

12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.

13 And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,

14 And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.

15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.

16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

Desmond Tutu: An Emissary of Satan Desires Hell

Archbishop Tutu Would Rather Go to Hell Than Go to a Homophobic Heaven!

South Africa's retired False Archbishop   and Nobel Peace Prize winner Desmond Tutu was speaking at the launch of the United Nations-backed campaign in South Africa to promote gay rights. Tutu compared homophobia to racism. He went on to say that he would rather go to Hell than go to a Homophobic Heaven(source)!  I don't think Tutu is working on the Kingdom of Heaven team.  What team is he working for then? You guessed it! Team Satan and the Kingdom of Darkness! Behind the clergy collar and the religious title of Archbishop, this man is an emissary for Satan. He is not at all a man of G-d, but a man of Satan! Let's look at the the truth of the roots behind the agenda Desmond Tutu is attempting to advance for the kingdom of darkness.

Desmond Tutu's Devilish Resume 

Tutu desires a One World Government and a One World Religion

Desmond Tutu follows an agenda that is Anti-Christ. This man not only promotes homosexuality, but abortion, one world government, one world religion, and an anti-biblical view of Jesus Christ.

Point 1: Tutu promotes abortion.
He has stated the following about abortion, "Planned Parenthood is an obligation of those who are Christians. Our church thinks we should use scientific methods that assist in planning families(source)."

Point 2: Tutu is helping to push a one-world government.
Not only is Desmond Tutu a supporter of the United Nations, but as quiet as it's kept he is a supporter of "The World Constitution and Parliament Association."  What is The World Constitution and Parliament Association? It's an association that is looking to replace the United Nations.  It looks to protect the mother earth environment, abolish war, make world patriotism the norm over national patriotism, operate world judiciary, defend universal human rights, and end poverty (source).  This association is attempting to usher in a one-world government, in which Tutu is playing a role.  This man is obviously globalist.

Point 3: Desmond Tutu is a proud member and supporter of the United Religious Initiative.
The United Religious Initiative is an organization that was established by Episcopal Bishop William Swing. Swing's vision is to set up a united nations of religions, and ultimately establish a one world religion.

Point 4: Desmond Tutu holds anti-biblical beliefs of Jesus Christ.
This false Bishop doesn't even believe in the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ(source). In his book "God is not a Christian: And Other Provocations," he promotes inclusion stating that all religions, atheist, and sinners are the children of God(source/source). Let's see how Tutu's beliefs don't lineup with the scriptures:

Romans 10:9

King James Version (KJV)

9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.

John 14:6

King James Version (KJV)

6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

Desmond Tutu is a strong believer in the "doctrine of inclusion," and not the "gospel of Jesus Christ." He is an agent of Satan who is promoting the agenda of Anti-Christ while aiding the soon coming system of Anti-Christ as seen in Revelation 13.

Tutu, you don't have to worry about going to a "homophobic heaven" because 1 Corinthians 6:9 states that those who participate in homosexual activity shall not inherit the Kingdom of God.  Any person with unrepented sin that is against the Word of God will not inherit the Kingdom of God. Your Nobel Peace Prize and other worldly accolades will not help you when you are judged in the final judgement of Jesus Christ.  If you don't repent you will be cast into the Lake of Fire because of your unbelief in Jesus Christ and your disobedience to the Word of God.

Trust me, if Tutu gets his wish to go to Hell, he will soon find out that it's a place of  everlasting torment, fire, darkness, and gnashing of teeth.

Psalm 2 reminds me of Desmond Tutu's words and action(see below).

Psalm 2

Amplified Bible (AMP)

Psalm 2

1 Why do the nations assemble with commotion [uproar and confusion of voices], and why do the people imagine (meditate upon and devise) an empty scheme?

2 The kings of the earth take their places; the rulers take counsel together against the Lord and His Anointed One (the Messiah, the Christ). They say,

3 Let us break Their bands [of restraint] asunder and cast Their cords [of control] from us.

4 He Who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord has them in derision [and in supreme contempt He mocks them].

5 He speaks to them in His deep anger and troubles (terrifies and confounds) them in His displeasure and fury, saying,

6 Yet have I anointed (installed and placed) My King [firmly] on My holy hill of Zion.

7 I will declare the decree of the Lord: He said to Me, You are My Son; this day [I declare] I have begotten You.

8 Ask of Me, and I will give You the nations as Your inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth as Your possession.

9 You shall break them with a rod of iron; You shall dash them in pieces like potters’ ware.

10 Now therefore, O you kings, act wisely; be instructed and warned, O you rulers of the earth.

11 Serve the Lord with reverent awe and worshipful fear; rejoice and be in high spirits with trembling [lest you displease Him].

12 Kiss the Son [pay homage to Him in purity], lest He be angry and you perish in the way, for soon shall His wrath be kindled. O blessed (happy, fortunate, and to be envied) are all those who seek refuge and put their trust in Him!

Identifying the Anti-Christ

Dr. Michael Brown Video Identifying Anti-Christ

Questions You Need to Ask Yourself from this Video

1. How many people believe in Jesus as the Messiah/Christ?

2. How many people believe in a Anti-Christ?

3. Is the world ripe for the soon coming of the Son of Perdition the Anti-Christ?

4. How many Christians are in a lukewarm status?

5. Will you side with the Son of G-d Jesus Christ or the Son of Perdition? 

Media Icon Glad to Sit on Satan's Righthand

The late great news media icon Walter Cronkite's comment in the above video, "I am glad to sit on the righthand of Satan," let's you know who he was serving.  Based on Cronkite's comments, it sounds just like a  quote from page 53 of H.P. Blavatsky book, "The Secret Doctrine." In it, Blavatsky quotes Milton's Paradise Lost in reference to Satan the "Fallen One," stating, "Better to reign in hell than serve in heaven!"  On the very same page, she states, "Better be man, the crown of terrestial production, and king over its opus operatum, than be lost among the will-less Spiritual Hosts in Heaven."

Cronkite's vision was to see a world government and to reign with Satan over this New World Order.  Unfortuately for Cronkite and Blavatsky, both were deceived by Satan into thinking they would reign with him.  However both now sit in Hell waiting for their final sentencing to the Lake of Fire where all the rebels of this current world system are destined to go.  No one, including Satan, will rule the Lake of Fire.  All will be tormented forever.  (Revelation 20:7-10, Revelation 21:8)